英语翻译The end of constitutionalism becomes maintenance of an inheritance from the Founders,who must be approached with a kind of reverence.Maintenance,accordingly,requires a new form of auto-theory.Originalism,in turn,is undermined by the belie

英语翻译The end of constitutionalism becomes maintenance of an inheritance from the Founders,who must be approached with a kind of reverence.Maintenance,accordingly,requires a new form of auto-theory.Originalism,in turn,is undermined by the belie
英语翻译
The end of constitutionalism becomes maintenance of an inheritance from the Founders,who must be approached with a kind of reverence.Maintenance,accordingly,requires a new form of auto-theory.Originalism,in turn,is undermined by the belief thatsuch reverence amounts to submission to the dead hand of the past and is thus inconsistent with the norm of self-government.Originalism simply has no way to resolve this tension between maintenance and self-construction.It must,therefore,give way to ideas of an evolving,unwritten constitution.The true constitution now appears to be not the dead letter of a past generation,but an evolving set of historical practices that grow with the nation.The genealogical account does not end here,but this is enough to see how it is an ordered progression through a domain of limited possibilities.This progression offers a genealogy of the distinctive character of contemporary theory with its dominant concerns for discourse and narrative within an interpretive community.
An architectural approach to auto-theroy begins with the recognition that historically determined paradigms survive not simply as remanants,but as positions that remains attractive to individuals and groups.Originalism may be displaced as the dominant paradigm,but it remains a resource for argument within legal practic.Architecture investigates how the variety of approaches continue to relate ro each other.As in the other areas of inquirty,there is no single scheme of relationships.These paradigms can be related along dimensions of reason and will,For example,the legitimating moment of will--consent--cant be located in the past(Robert Bork on originalism),the present(John Ely on democratic process),or the future (Alexander Bickel on emerging consensus).In the dimension of reason,one might locate the legitimating form of reason in abstract principles of morality (John Rawls or Ronald Dworkin),in a process of reason-giving(Cass Sunstein or Frank Michelman),or even in a form of reason working itself out through social evolution(nineteenth-century social Darwinsit views).Given our conceptual resources there are a limited number of positions available.We are not in a position to argue that constitutional law is legitimate because,for example,it is dicinelu inspired or because it is an expression of the sublime.
In the end,all thories of the legitimacy of constitutional law fail because the task of reconciling self-government and temporality is not achievable.This,however,is a statement made from outside the practice.From the exterior,the endeavor looks like a contradiction.From the interior,all of these theories succeed,although not in the

英语翻译The end of constitutionalism becomes maintenance of an inheritance from the Founders,who must be approached with a kind of reverence.Maintenance,accordingly,requires a new form of auto-theory.Originalism,in turn,is undermined by the belie
最后,成为维护业宪政的创始人,他就必须以一种尊敬维护,因此,需要一个新形式的auto-theory反过来,是由于受崇敬的信仰thatsuch等于屈从于这阴魂不散的过去,因此是不符合标准的自治由于根本就没有办法解决这二者之间的张力维修、.它,因此给思想的演进、不成文的宪法.真正的宪法现在似乎不是死人的信,但过去代进化的历史惯例,随着国家家谱帐户不停止,但这足以看出这是个井然有序发展的领域,通过有限的可能性这一过程提供了一个独特的个性的当代理论和其主要关心的话语和叙事在诠释的社区.
建筑学方法来auto-theroy开始认识到历史上确定不仅仅作为remanants范式生存,但仍具有吸引力的职位,个人和团体由于可能会成为占统治地位的范例,但它仍然是一种资源,在法律实践争论…建筑学研究了多种方式继续与彼此抢劫…在其他地区一样,没有任何inquirty方案的关系这些范例可以沿着维度的原因及有关,例如,合法性的时刻———同意将不能位于过去(罗伯特·博克上),目前由于(约翰·伊对民主进程),或将来在新兴的共识Bickel(亚历山大.维的原因之一,可能会找到合法性的原因在抽象的道德原则(约翰·罗尔斯或参阅范进),在过程中reason-giving(社科院Sunstein或弗兰克Michelman),甚至是在一种理性的工作本身通过社会进化(19世纪的社会Darwinsit视图).Given我们的概念资源有一定数量的职位空缺我们不能认为宪法是合法的,因为,举例来说,这是dicinelu灵感,因为它是一种表达或的崇高.
最后,所有的面容的合法性宪法失败,因为这项任务来缓解被达成时,时序性自治,…然而,这是来自国外的方式从外,努力看上去就像一个矛盾从内部,所有的这些理论的成功,尽管不在

年底宪政成为维护遗产的创始人，谁必须采取同一种reverence.Maintenance ，因此，需要一种新形式的自动theory.Originalism ，反过来又削弱了信仰thatsuch崇敬数额提交死者的手过去，因此不符合规范的自我government.Originalism只是没有办法来解决这一紧张关系的维护和自我construction.It ，因此必须让位于思想的演进，不成文宪法。真正...

全部展开

年底宪政成为维护遗产的创始人，谁必须采取同一种reverence.Maintenance ，因此，需要一种新形式的自动theory.Originalism ，反过来又削弱了信仰thatsuch崇敬数额提交死者的手过去，因此不符合规范的自我government.Originalism只是没有办法来解决这一紧张关系的维护和自我construction.It ，因此必须让位于思想的演进，不成文宪法。真正的宪法现在似乎不是一纸空文了过去一代人，而是一个不断发展的历史惯例，增长与nation.The家谱帐户没有在这里结束，但是这是足够的，看看它是一个有序的发展，通过域的有限possibilities.This发展提供了一个家谱的显着特征的当代理论的主要关切的问题的讨论和说明的解释性社会。
一个建筑的方法自动理论开始认识到，历史上确定的模式生存不仅仅是remanants ，但仍然是有吸引力的职位，个人和groups.Originalism可能流离失所的主导模式，但它仍然是一个资源的说法在法律如何practic.Architecture调查各种办法继续与反渗透每个other.As在其他领域的inquirty ，没有一个单一的计划relationships.These范式可沿层面的相关原因，并举例来说，合法化的时刻意志-同意- cant位于过去（罗伯特波克的原意） ，本（约翰伊利对民主进程的） ，或未来的（亚历山大Bickel对正在形成的共识） 。维度的原因，人们可能会找到该合法化形式的原因摘要道德原则（罗尔斯或罗纳德德沃金）过程中的原因给予（卡斯森斯坦或弗兰克米歇尔曼） ，甚至在某种形式的工作本身的原因，通过社会变革（ 19世纪社会Darwinsit意见） 。鉴于我们的概念资源有数量有限的职位available.We是不能够认为，宪法法律是合法的，因为，例如，它是启发或dicinelu ，因为它表达了崇高的。
最后，所有thories的合法性失败，因为宪法的任务调和自治和时间性不achievable.This不过，发表的声明以外的practice.From外，事业看似矛盾。从内部，所有这些理论成功，虽然没有在

收起