英文文章修改I do not agree with this point of view.Because a country's development must be people-centered,democratic to make laws by the treaty.If you want to set up a bill must be democratic vote to decide whether to restrict the freedom of t

英文文章修改I do not agree with this point of view.Because a country's development must be people-centered,democratic to make laws by the treaty.If you want to set up a bill must be democratic vote to decide whether to restrict the freedom of t
英文文章修改
I do not agree with this point of view.Because a country's development must be people-centered,democratic to make laws by the treaty.If you want to set up a bill must be democratic vote to decide whether to restrict the freedom of the people in general.I think that there is no democracy would not be a good country,these are relationships with people happiness.To achieve the public goal of equality is a very difficult task.Limit the power of freedom should not be attributed to the hands of the country,so the public can be submitted to convince hands.I think there are some similarities with the religion.
My option is that traditional political science theory with the hanes and smith are differences.The traditional view is that there is a vacuum and did not specify the African Americans oppressed by slavery,but the ambiguous power system.Hanes and Smith is very specific that the African American universal freedom and non-universal freedom of free bill period.
第二段中文意思（ 请好心人用自己的语言来帮忙翻译一下）
我的意见是传统政治学于hane and smith 是有不同区别的。在传统理念看来，在一个真空期的时候用权力把美国黑人当成奴隶所压迫，然而使得这个国家的制度对美国黑人而言是遭受平等待遇。hanes and smith 具体的说明了美国黑人的奴隶制度实行了多久和他们又是从什么时候解放的。

英文文章修改I do not agree with this point of view.Because a country's development must be people-centered,democratic to make laws by the treaty.If you want to set up a bill must be democratic vote to decide whether to restrict the freedom of t
I do not agree with this point of view.Because a country's development must be people-centered,democratic enough to make laws by the treaty.If you want to set up a bill,then it must be decided by democratic votes,you cannot make the decisions for them and restrict the freedom of people in general.I think that a peaceful country cannot be without democracy,it directly relates to people's happiness.To achieve the public goal of equality is a very difficult task.Limitations to the power of freedom should not be attributed to the ruling party of the country,it should be up to the people.(I think there are some similarities with the religion ).
My opinion is different from Hane and Smith's traditional political studies.The traditional view is that force should be applied in the very beginning to oppress the African Americans and to enslave them,thus causing the country's laws to be fair in their point of view.Hanes and Smith detailed the length of time that African Americans were enslaved and freed.
除了一句外,其他都翻译好了.